1991 Westerly Seahawk vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

1991 Westerly Seahawk 1991 Westerly Seahawk
VS
1982 Freedom 28 1982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1991 Westerly Seahawk 1982 Freedom 28
General
Manufacturer Westerly Freedom
Year 1991–1997 1982–1988
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK USA
Designer Ed Dubois Garry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,123 kg (13,499 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 48.0 m² (517 ft²) 29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 220 L (58.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 5
Cabins 3 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is 1.83m longer than the 1982 Freedom 28. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk displaces approximately 145% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Freedom 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Freedom 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS