Hunter 31 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

Hunter 31 Hunter 31
VS
1982 Freedom 28 1982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hunter 31 1982 Freedom 28
General
Manufacturer Hunter Freedom
Year 2000–2005 1982–1988
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Glenn Henderson Garry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam 3.12 m (10.2 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 44.0 m² (474 ft²) 29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 31
17.51
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 31
38.90
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 31
0.78
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 31
18.65
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 31 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 31 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The Hunter 31 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the Hunter 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.12m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The Hunter 31 is 0.92m longer than the 1982 Freedom 28. The Hunter 31 displaces approximately 64% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 31 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 31 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Hunter 31 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS