1965 Bristol 35.5 vs 1979 Cal 39 — Comparison

1965 Bristol 35.5
VS
1979 Cal 391979 Cal 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Bristol 35.51979 Cal 39
General
ManufacturerBristolCal
Year1965–19721979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Bristol 35.5
14.75
1979 Cal 39
15.78
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Bristol 35.5
41.53
1979 Cal 39
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Bristol 35.5
0.66
1979 Cal 39
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Bristol 35.5
28.88
1979 Cal 39
21.05

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 1979 Cal 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is a classic design by Bristol from USA, while the 1979 Cal 39 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1979 Cal 39 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1979 Cal 39 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1979 Cal 39 is 1.07m longer than the 1965 Bristol 35.5. The 1979 Cal 39 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.75 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1979 Cal 39, with an SA/D of 15.78 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1979 Cal 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The 1979 Cal 39 has a comfort ratio of 21.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 41.7% for the 1979 Cal 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1979 Cal 39 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1979 Cal 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Cal 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Bristol 35.5 · 1979 Cal 39