1965 Bristol 35.5 vs 1983 Freedom 36 — Comparison

1965 Bristol 35.5
VS
1983 Freedom 361983 Freedom 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Bristol 35.51983 Freedom 36
General
ManufacturerBristolFreedom
Year1965–19721983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)49.0 m² (527 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Bristol 35.5
14.75
1983 Freedom 36
14.88
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Bristol 35.5
41.53
1983 Freedom 36
37.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Bristol 35.5
0.66
1983 Freedom 36
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Bristol 35.5
28.88
1983 Freedom 36
18.82

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 1983 Freedom 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is a classic design by Bristol from USA, while the 1983 Freedom 36 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1983 Freedom 36 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1983 Freedom 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1983 Freedom 36 is 0.15m longer than the 1965 Bristol 35.5. The 1983 Freedom 36 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.75 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1983 Freedom 36, with an SA/D of 14.88 and 49.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Freedom 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The 1983 Freedom 36 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 37.0% for the 1983 Freedom 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1983 Freedom 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Freedom 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Bristol 35.5 · 1983 Freedom 36