1965 Bristol 35.5 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

1965 Bristol 35.5
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Bristol 35.51996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerBristolNajad
Year1965–19721996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Bristol 35.5
14.75
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Bristol 35.5
41.53
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Bristol 35.5
0.66
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Bristol 35.5
28.88
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is a classic design by Bristol from USA, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 0.73m longer than the 1965 Bristol 35.5. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.75 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Bristol 35.5 · 1996 Najad 380