1965 Bristol 35.5 vs 2000 Najad 355 — Comparison

1965 Bristol 35.5 1965 Bristol 35.5
VS
2000 Najad 355 2000 Najad 355

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1965 Bristol 35.5 2000 Najad 355
General
Manufacturer Bristol Najad
Year 1965–1972 2000–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Sweden
Designer Halsey Herreshoff Judel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA 10.82 m (35.5 ft) 10.72 m (35.2 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.38 m (11.1 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)
Ballast 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 47.4 m² (510 ft²) 51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 110 L (29.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Bristol 35.5
14.75
2000 Najad 355
15.69
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Bristol 35.5
41.53
2000 Najad 355
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Bristol 35.5
0.66
2000 Najad 355
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Bristol 35.5
28.88
2000 Najad 355
20.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 2000 Najad 355 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is a classic design by Bristol from USA, while the 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 2000 Najad 355 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 2000 Najad 355 at 10.72m (35.2ft) with a 3.38m beam. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is 0.10m longer than the 2000 Najad 355. The 2000 Najad 355 displaces approximately 2% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.75 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 2000 Najad 355, with an SA/D of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Najad 355 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The 2000 Najad 355 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2000 Najad 355 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 110L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Najad 355 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS