1988 C&C 32 vs 2000 Najad 355 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32 1988 C&C 32
VS
2000 Najad 355 2000 Najad 355

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1988 C&C 32 2000 Najad 355
General
Manufacturer C&C Yachts Najad
Year 1988–1993 2000–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Canada Sweden
Designer Cuthbertson & Cassian Judel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 10.72 m (35.2 ft)
LWL 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 3.38 m (11.1 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)
Ballast 1,996 kg (4,400 lbs) 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 45.8 m² (493 ft²) 51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 110 L (29.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
2000 Najad 355
15.69
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
2000 Najad 355
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
2000 Najad 355
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
2000 Najad 355
20.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and 2000 Najad 355 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 2000 Najad 355 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 2000 Najad 355 at 10.72m (35.2ft) with a 3.38m beam. The 2000 Najad 355 is 0.97m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The 2000 Najad 355 displaces approximately 32% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The 2000 Najad 355, with an SA/D of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2000 Najad 355 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2000 Najad 355 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 110L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Najad 355 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS