1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC vs 2000 Najad 355 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
VS
2000 Najad 355 2000 Najad 355

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC 2000 Najad 355
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Najad
Year 1998–2003 2000–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France Sweden
Designer Groupe Finot Judel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 10.72 m (35.2 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam 3.65 m (12.0 ft) 3.38 m (11.1 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,100 kg (15,653 lbs) 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)
Ballast 2,500 kg (5,512 lbs) 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 59.0 m² (635 ft²) 51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 110 L (29.1 gal)
Water Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
16.23
2000 Najad 355
15.69
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
35.21
2000 Najad 355
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
0.76
2000 Najad 355
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
19.82
2000 Najad 355
20.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 2000 Najad 355 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC was penned by Groupe Finot. The 2000 Najad 355 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 2000 Najad 355 at 10.72m (35.2ft) with a 3.38m beam. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is 0.25m longer than the 2000 Najad 355. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.23 and 59.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Najad 355, with an SA/D of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2000 Najad 355 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 35.2% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 2000 Najad 355 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 110L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Najad 355 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS