2000 Najad 355 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison
2000 Najad 355
2000 Sabre 386
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2000 Najad 355 | 2000 Sabre 386 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Sabre |
| Year | 2000–2010 | 2000–2007 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | USA |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Jim Taylor |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.72 m (35.2 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.38 m (11.1 ft) | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs) | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 51.0 m² (549 ft²) | 60.5 m² (651 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 28 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 110 L (29.1 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2000 Najad 355 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2000 Najad 355 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.
In terms of size, the 2000 Najad 355 measures 10.72m (35.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 0.86m longer than the 2000 Najad 355. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2000 Najad 355 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2000 Najad 355 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2000 Najad 355 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Najad 355 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.