2000 Sabre 386 vs 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 — Comparison

2000 Sabre 386 2000 Sabre 386
VS
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2000 Sabre 386 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
General
Manufacturer Sabre Beneteau
Year 2000–2007 2009–2013
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Jim Taylor Finot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 10.44 m (34.3 ft)
LWL 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam 3.56 m (11.7 ft) 3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.75 m (5.7 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) 5,550 kg (12,236 lbs)
Ballast 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) 1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 60.5 m² (651 ft²) 51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
16.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
28.83
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Sabre 386
19.37
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
18.09

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Sabre 386 and 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is a 2000s offering from Beneteau from France. The 2000 Sabre 386 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 2000 Sabre 386 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 at 10.44m (34.3ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 1.14m longer than the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Sabre 386 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, with an SA/D of 16.53 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Sabre 386 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386 and 28.8% for the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Sabre 386 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS