2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
VS
2000 Sabre 386 2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 2000 Sabre 386
General
Manufacturer X-Yachts Sabre
Year 2010–2016 2000–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Denmark USA
Designer Niels Jeppesen Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 10.57 m (34.7 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 9.20 m (30.2 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 52.0 m² (560 ft²) 60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 70 L (18.5 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 140 L (37.0 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 measures 10.57m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 1.01m longer than the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 70L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS