2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35
VS
2000 Sabre 386 2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 2000 Sabre 386
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Sabre
Year 2015–2018 2000–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer Groupe Finot-Conq Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 10.45 m (34.3 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 9.38 m (30.8 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.72 m (12.2 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 1.90 m (6.2 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,100 kg (13,448 lbs) 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 57.0 m² (614 ft²) 60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 21 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 80 L (21.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35
17.35
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35
30.33
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35
0.82
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35
17.31
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 was penned by Groupe Finot-Conq. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 measures 10.45m (34.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 1.13m longer than the 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.35 and 57.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.3% for the 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 Beneteau Oceanis 35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS