1965 Pearson Vanguard vs Catalina 390 — Comparison

1965 Pearson Vanguard 1965 Pearson Vanguard
VS
Catalina 390 Catalina 390

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1965 Pearson Vanguard Catalina 390
General
Manufacturer Pearson Catalina
Year 1965–1972 1997–2003
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Philip Rhodes Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 9.83 m (32.3 ft) 11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL 7.01 m (23.0 ft) 10.21 m (33.5 ft)
Beam 2.84 m (9.3 ft) 3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) 8,256 kg (18,201 lbs)
Ballast 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 36.0 m² (388 ft²) 65.5 m² (705 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 265 L (70.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 7
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
14.32
Catalina 390
16.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
41.11
Catalina 390
39.56
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
0.71
Catalina 390
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
25.31
Catalina 390
18.93

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and Catalina 390 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the Catalina 390 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The Catalina 390 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the Catalina 390 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Catalina 390 is 2.06m longer than the 1965 Pearson Vanguard. The Catalina 390 displaces approximately 102% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 390, with an SA/D of 16.29 and 65.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 390 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The Catalina 390 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 39.6% for the Catalina 390, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Catalina 390 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 265L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 390 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 390 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS