Catalina 390 vs 2015 ClubSwan 36 — Comparison

Catalina 390 Catalina 390
VS
2015 ClubSwan 36 2015 ClubSwan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 390 2015 ClubSwan 36
General
Manufacturer Catalina Nautor Swan
Year 1997–2003 2015
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Finland
Designer Gerry Douglas Juan Kouyoumdjian
Dimensions
LOA 11.89 m (39.0 ft) 11.00 m (36.1 ft)
LWL 10.21 m (33.5 ft) 9.90 m (32.5 ft)
Beam 3.76 m (12.3 ft) 3.30 m (10.8 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 2.30 m (7.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,256 kg (18,201 lbs) 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs)
Ballast 3,266 kg (7,200 lbs) 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 65.5 m² (705 ft²) 65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 40 L (10.6 gal)
Water Capacity 265 L (70.0 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 4
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 390
16.29
2015 ClubSwan 36
23.21
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 390
39.56
2015 ClubSwan 36
35.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 390
0.75
2015 ClubSwan 36
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 390
18.93
2015 ClubSwan 36
14.37

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 390 and 2015 ClubSwan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 390 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The Catalina 390 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was designed by Juan Kouyoumdjian.

In terms of size, the Catalina 390 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 2015 ClubSwan 36 at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.30m beam. The Catalina 390 is 0.89m longer than the 2015 ClubSwan 36. The Catalina 390 displaces approximately 72% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 390 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.5 m² of sail area. The 2015 ClubSwan 36, with an SA/D of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 390 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has a comfort ratio of 14.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 39.6% for the Catalina 390 and 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 390 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 265L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L water and 40L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 390 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 390 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS