2015 ClubSwan 36 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

2015 ClubSwan 36 2015 ClubSwan 36
VS
1995 Feeling 39 1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2015 ClubSwan 36 1995 Feeling 39
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Feeling
Year 2015 1995–2003
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland France
Designer Juan Kouyoumdjian Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 11.00 m (36.1 ft) 11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL 9.90 m (32.5 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam 3.30 m (10.8 ft) 3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft 2.30 m (7.5 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 65.0 m² (700 ft²) 66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 40 L (10.6 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 7
Cabins 1 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2015 ClubSwan 36
23.21
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2015 ClubSwan 36
35.42
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2015 ClubSwan 36
0.78
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2015 ClubSwan 36
14.37
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was penned by Juan Kouyoumdjian. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 measures 11.00m (36.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 0.80m longer than the 2015 ClubSwan 36. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 63% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS