1966 Islander 33 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1966 Islander 33 1966 Islander 33
VS
Hunter 33 Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1966 Islander 33 Hunter 33
General
Manufacturer Islander Hunter
Year 1966–1974 1988–1994
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Joseph McGlasson Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 42.0 m² (452 ft²) 48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1966 Islander 33
15.57
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1966 Islander 33
39.99
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1966 Islander 33
0.72
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1966 Islander 33
23.44
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1966 Islander 33 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1966 Islander 33 is a classic design by Islander from USA, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1966 Islander 33 was penned by Joseph McGlasson. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1966 Islander 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1966 Islander 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1966 Islander 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1966 Islander 33 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1966 Islander 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1966 Islander 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS