1966 Islander 33 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

1966 Islander 331966 Islander 33
VS
1992 Moody 411992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1966 Islander 331992 Moody 41
General
ManufacturerIslanderMoody
Year1966–19741992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerJoseph McGlassonBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1966 Islander 33
15.57
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1966 Islander 33
39.99
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1966 Islander 33
0.72
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1966 Islander 33
23.44
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The 1966 Islander 33 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1966 Islander 33 is a classic design by Islander from USA, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1966 Islander 33 was penned by Joseph McGlasson. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1966 Islander 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 2.44m longer than the 1966 Islander 33. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 116% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1966 Islander 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1966 Islander 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1966 Islander 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1966 Islander 33 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1966 Islander 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1966 Islander 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1966 Islander 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1966 Islander 33 · 1992 Moody 41