1966 Islander 33 vs Hunter 36 — Comparison

1966 Islander 331966 Islander 33
VS
Hunter 36Hunter 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1966 Islander 33Hunter 36
General
ManufacturerIslanderHunter
Year1966–19741996–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerJoseph McGlassonGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1966 Islander 33
15.57
Hunter 36
17.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1966 Islander 33
39.99
Hunter 36
39.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1966 Islander 33
0.72
Hunter 36
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1966 Islander 33
23.44
Hunter 36
17.17

Detailed Comparison

The 1966 Islander 33 and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1966 Islander 33 is a classic design by Islander from USA, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1966 Islander 33 was penned by Joseph McGlasson. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1966 Islander 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The Hunter 36 is 0.76m longer than the 1966 Islander 33. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 30% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1966 Islander 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1966 Islander 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1966 Islander 33 and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1966 Islander 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1966 Islander 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1966 Islander 33 · Hunter 36