1967 Columbia 43 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

1967 Columbia 431967 Columbia 43
VS
1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Columbia 431990 Sabre 36
General
ManufacturerColumbiaSabre
Year1967–19731990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam TrippRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA13.11 m (43.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area71.0 m² (764 ft²)52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Columbia 43
16.05
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Columbia 43
42.86
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Columbia 43
0.67
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Columbia 43
24.24
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Columbia 43 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Columbia 43 is a classic design by Columbia from USA, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1967 Columbia 43 was penned by William Tripp. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1967 Columbia 43 measures 13.11m (43.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1967 Columbia 43 is 2.14m longer than the 1990 Sabre 36. The 1967 Columbia 43 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Columbia 43 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.05 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 Sabre 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Columbia 43 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.67). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1967 Columbia 43 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Columbia 43 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Columbia 43 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Sabre 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1967 Columbia 43 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Columbia 43 · 1990 Sabre 36