1967 Pearson 35 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1967 Pearson 35 | 1996 Najad 380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Najad |
| Year | 1967–1973 | 1996–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Sweden |
| Designer | William Shaw | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 48.6 m² (523 ft²) | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 260 L (68.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1967 Pearson 35 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 0.88m longer than the 1967 Pearson 35. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1967 Pearson 35 · 1996 Najad 380