1967 Pearson 35 vs Bavaria 40 — Comparison

1967 Pearson 35
VS
Bavaria 40Bavaria 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Pearson 35Bavaria 40
General
ManufacturerPearsonBavaria
Year1967–19732001–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerWilliam ShawJ&J Design
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)12.35 m (40.5 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.75 m (35.3 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.99 m (13.1 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.6 m² (523 ft²)72.0 m² (775 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)300 L (79.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Pearson 35
15.96
Bavaria 40
17.56
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Pearson 35
41.67
Bavaria 40
30.59
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Pearson 35
0.69
Bavaria 40
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Pearson 35
26.00
Bavaria 40
16.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Pearson 35 and Bavaria 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the Bavaria 40 is a 2000s offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The Bavaria 40 was designed by J&J Design.

In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Bavaria 40 at 12.35m (40.5ft) with a 3.99m beam. The Bavaria 40 is 1.68m longer than the 1967 Pearson 35. The Bavaria 40 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The Bavaria 40, with an SA/D of 17.56 and 72.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The Bavaria 40 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 30.6% for the Bavaria 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Bavaria 40 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 160L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Pearson 35 · Bavaria 40