1967 Pearson 35 vs 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 — Comparison

1967 Pearson 35 1967 Pearson 35
VS
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1967 Pearson 35 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
General
Manufacturer Pearson X-Yachts
Year 1967–1973 2010–2016
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Denmark
Designer William Shaw Niels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 10.57 m (34.7 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 48.6 m² (523 ft²) 52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 70 L (18.5 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Pearson 35
15.96
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Pearson 35
41.67
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Pearson 35
0.69
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Pearson 35
26.00
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Pearson 35 and 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 at 10.57m (34.7ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1967 Pearson 35 is 0.10m longer than the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, with an SA/D of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 70L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS