1968 Alberg 35 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

1968 Alberg 35
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1968 Alberg 352003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerVariousSabre
Year1968–19782003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerCarl AlbergJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1968 Alberg 35
14.12
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1968 Alberg 35
41.67
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1968 Alberg 35
0.66
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1968 Alberg 35
27.81
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 1968 Alberg 35 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Alberg 35 is a classic design by Various from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1968 Alberg 35 was penned by Carl Alberg. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1968 Alberg 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 1.52m longer than the 1968 Alberg 35. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1968 Alberg 35 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.12 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1968 Alberg 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 27.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1968 Alberg 35 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1968 Alberg 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1968 Alberg 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1968 Alberg 35 · 2003 Sabre 402