1969 Cal 34 vs Hunter 31 — Comparison

1969 Cal 34 1969 Cal 34
VS
Hunter 31 Hunter 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1969 Cal 34 Hunter 31
General
Manufacturer Cal Hunter
Year 1969–1975 2000–2005
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Bill Lapworth Glenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 8.08 m (26.5 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.65 m (5.4 ft) 1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs) 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 47.4 m² (510 ft²) 44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Cal 34
16.01
Hunter 31
17.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Cal 34
39.13
Hunter 31
38.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Cal 34
0.70
Hunter 31
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Cal 34
23.63
Hunter 31
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Cal 34 and Hunter 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Cal 34 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Hunter 31 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1969 Cal 34 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Hunter 31 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1969 Cal 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 1969 Cal 34 is 0.91m longer than the Hunter 31. The 1969 Cal 34 displaces approximately 28% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Cal 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The Hunter 31, with an SA/D of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Cal 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Hunter 31 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 39.1% for the 1969 Cal 34 and 38.9% for the Hunter 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Cal 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Cal 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS