1969 Cal 34 vs 1981 Nautor Swan 36 — Comparison

1969 Cal 34 1969 Cal 34
VS
1981 Nautor Swan 36 1981 Nautor Swan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1969 Cal 34 1981 Nautor Swan 36
General
Manufacturer Cal Nautor Swan
Year 1969–1975 1981–1989
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Finland
Designer Bill Lapworth Sparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 8.08 m (26.5 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.65 m (5.4 ft) 1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs) 6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 47.4 m² (510 ft²) 54.5 m² (587 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Cal 34
16.01
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Cal 34
39.13
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Cal 34
0.70
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Cal 34
23.63
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Cal 34 and 1981 Nautor Swan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Cal 34 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 1969 Cal 34 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the 1969 Cal 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is 0.61m longer than the 1969 Cal 34. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Cal 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36, with an SA/D of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Cal 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 39.1% for the 1969 Cal 34 and 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Cal 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Cal 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS