1969 Cal 34 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

1969 Cal 341969 Cal 34
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1969 Cal 34Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerCalHunter
Year1969–19752000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBill LapworthGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Cal 34
16.01
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Cal 34
39.13
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Cal 34
0.70
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Cal 34
23.63
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Cal 34 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Cal 34 is a classic design by Cal from USA, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1969 Cal 34 was penned by Bill Lapworth. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1969 Cal 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The Hunter 356 is 0.46m longer than the 1969 Cal 34. The Hunter 356 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Cal 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Cal 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 39.1% for the 1969 Cal 34 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Cal 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Cal 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1969 Cal 34 · Hunter 356