1969 Ericson 35 vs Hunter 36 — Comparison

1969 Ericson 35
VS
Hunter 36Hunter 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1969 Ericson 35Hunter 36
General
ManufacturerEricsonHunter
Year1969–19761996–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBruce KingGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL7.92 m (26.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.6 m² (523 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1969 Ericson 35
15.96
Hunter 36
17.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1969 Ericson 35
40.00
Hunter 36
39.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1969 Ericson 35
0.69
Hunter 36
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1969 Ericson 35
24.76
Hunter 36
17.17

Detailed Comparison

The 1969 Ericson 35 and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1969 Ericson 35 is a classic design by Ericson from USA, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1969 Ericson 35 was penned by Bruce King. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1969 Ericson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The Hunter 36 is 0.15m longer than the 1969 Ericson 35. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1969 Ericson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1969 Ericson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1969 Ericson 35 and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1969 Ericson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1969 Ericson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1969 Ericson 35 · Hunter 36