1970 Bristol 32 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1970 Bristol 32 1970 Bristol 32
VS
Hanse 320 Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1970 Bristol 32 Hanse 320
General
Manufacturer Bristol Hanse
Year 1970–1977 2005–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Halsey Herreshoff judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL 7.16 m (23.5 ft) 8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 40.2 m² (433 ft²) 46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Bristol 32
14.91
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Bristol 32
42.00
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Bristol 32
0.72
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Bristol 32
25.96
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Bristol 32 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The Hanse 320 is 0.17m longer than the 1970 Bristol 32. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS