1970 Bristol 32 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

1970 Bristol 32 1970 Bristol 32
VS
1990 Feeling 32 1990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1970 Bristol 32 1990 Feeling 32
General
Manufacturer Bristol Feeling
Year 1970–1977 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Halsey Herreshoff Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL 7.16 m (23.5 ft) 8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam 2.97 m (9.7 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 40.2 m² (433 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Bristol 32
14.91
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Bristol 32
42.00
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Bristol 32
0.72
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Bristol 32
25.96
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Bristol 32 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 0.10m longer than the 1970 Bristol 32. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1970 Bristol 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1970 Bristol 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS