1996 Najad 380 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison
1996 Najad 380
1990 Feeling 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1996 Najad 380 | 1990 Feeling 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Feeling |
| Year | 1996–2006 | 1990–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | France |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) | 9.85 m (32.3 ft) |
| LWL | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) | 8.20 m (26.9 ft) |
| Beam | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 1.50 m (4.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) | 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 260 L (68.7 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1996 Najad 380 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 1.70m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 60% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 Najad 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.