1971 Ranger 26 vs 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 — Comparison

1971 Ranger 261971 Ranger 26
VS
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1971 Ranger 261986 Pacific Seacraft 25
General
ManufacturerRangerPacific Seacraft
Year1971–19761986–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGary MullWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA7.92 m (26.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL6.40 m (21.0 ft)5.94 m (19.5 ft)
Beam2.62 m (8.6 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)953 kg (2,101 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area29.5 m² (318 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1971 Ranger 26
17.85
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1971 Ranger 26
41.66
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1971 Ranger 26
0.81
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1971 Ranger 26
19.73
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1971 Ranger 26 and 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1971 Ranger 26 is a 1970s design by Ranger from USA, while the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1971 Ranger 26 was penned by Gary Mull. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1971 Ranger 26 measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.62m, compared to the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1971 Ranger 26 is 0.30m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1971 Ranger 26 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.85 and 29.5 m² of sail area. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, with an SA/D of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1971 Ranger 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1971 Ranger 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has a comfort ratio of 25.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1971 Ranger 26 and 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1971 Ranger 26 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 45L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1971 Ranger 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1971 Ranger 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1971 Ranger 26 · 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25