1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 | 1976 C&C 33 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pacific Seacraft | C&C Yachts |
| Year | 1986–2007 | 1976–1982 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Canada |
| Designer | William Crealock | Cuthbertson & Cassian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| LWL | 5.94 m (19.5 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.07 m (3.5 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 953 kg (2,101 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 24.0 m² (258 ft²) | 42.0 m² (452 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 30 L (7.9 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was penned by William Crealock. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.
In terms of size, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 2.44m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1976 C&C 33 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1976 C&C 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1976 C&C 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1976 C&C 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 · 1976 C&C 33