1994 J/105 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1994 J/105
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 J/1051976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsC&C Yachts
Year1994–20081976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerRod JohnstoneCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA10.52 m (34.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.97 m (29.4 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1994 J/105 is 0.46m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 1976 C&C 33 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 C&C 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 J/105 · 1976 C&C 33