Hanse 375 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

Hanse 375
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3751976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerHanseC&C Yachts
Year2009–20151976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyCanada
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA11.35 m (37.2 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.05 m (33.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,000 kg (15,432 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,150 kg (4,740 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 375
17.21
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 375
30.71
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 375
0.76
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 375
17.59
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 375 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 375 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hanse 375 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the Hanse 375 measures 11.35m (37.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hanse 375 is 1.29m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The Hanse 375 displaces approximately 54% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 375 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.21 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 375 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 30.7% for the Hanse 375 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 375 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 C&C 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 375 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 375 · 1976 C&C 33