1971 Ranger 26 vs Hunter 185 — Comparison

1971 Ranger 26 1971 Ranger 26
VS
Hunter 185 Hunter 185

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1971 Ranger 26 Hunter 185
General
Manufacturer Ranger Hunter
Year 1971–1976 2000–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gary Mull Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 7.92 m (26.0 ft) 5.54 m (18.2 ft)
LWL 6.40 m (21.0 ft) 4.95 m (16.2 ft)
Beam 2.62 m (8.6 ft) 2.13 m (7.0 ft)
Draft 1.22 m (4.0 ft) 0.91 m (3.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 408 kg (899 lbs)
Ballast 907 kg (2,000 lbs) 82 kg (181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 29.5 m² (318 ft²) 13.0 m² (140 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Centerboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 2
Cabins 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1971 Ranger 26
17.85
Hunter 185
24.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1971 Ranger 26
41.66
Hunter 185
20.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1971 Ranger 26
0.81
Hunter 185
1.15
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1971 Ranger 26
19.73
Hunter 185
8.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1971 Ranger 26 and Hunter 185 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1971 Ranger 26 is a 1970s design by Ranger from USA, while the Hunter 185 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1971 Ranger 26 was penned by Gary Mull. The Hunter 185 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1971 Ranger 26 measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.62m, compared to the Hunter 185 at 5.54m (18.2ft) with a 2.13m beam. The 1971 Ranger 26 is 2.38m longer than the Hunter 185. The 1971 Ranger 26 displaces approximately 434% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1971 Ranger 26 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.85 and 29.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 185, with an SA/D of 24.03 and 13.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The Hunter 185 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1971 Ranger 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The Hunter 185 has a comfort ratio of 8.7 and a capsize screening value of 1.15. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1971 Ranger 26 and 20.1% for the Hunter 185, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1971 Ranger 26 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 45L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The Hunter 185 offers 2 berths with unspecified water tankage and unspecified fuel.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1971 Ranger 26 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 185 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1971 Ranger 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS