1972 Contest 31 vs 1980 Contest 33 — Comparison

1972 Contest 31 1972 Contest 31
VS
1980 Contest 33 1980 Contest 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1972 Contest 31 1980 Contest 33
General
Manufacturer Contest Contest
Year 1972–1982 1980–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Netherlands Netherlands
Designer Dick Zaal Dick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 39.5 m² (425 ft²) 44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Steel
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 22 HP
Fuel Capacity 80 L (21.1 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
1980 Contest 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
1980 Contest 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
1980 Contest 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
1980 Contest 33
22.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 1980 Contest 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1980 Contest 33 is a 1980s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1980 Contest 33 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1980 Contest 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1980 Contest 33 is 0.61m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1980 Contest 33 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 1980 Contest 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1980 Contest 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1980 Contest 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 40.4% for the 1980 Contest 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1980 Contest 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 Contest 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1980 Contest 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS