1972 Contest 31 vs 1983 Freedom 36 — Comparison

1972 Contest 31 1972 Contest 31
VS
1983 Freedom 36 1983 Freedom 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1972 Contest 31 1983 Freedom 36
General
Manufacturer Contest Freedom
Year 1972–1982 1983–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Netherlands USA
Designer Dick Zaal Garry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) 6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 39.5 m² (425 ft²) 49.0 m² (527 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 25 HP
Fuel Capacity 80 L (21.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
1983 Freedom 36
14.88
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
1983 Freedom 36
37.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
1983 Freedom 36
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
1983 Freedom 36
18.82

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 1983 Freedom 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1983 Freedom 36 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1983 Freedom 36 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1983 Freedom 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1983 Freedom 36 is 1.52m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1983 Freedom 36 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 1983 Freedom 36, with an SA/D of 14.88 and 49.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Freedom 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1983 Freedom 36 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 37.0% for the 1983 Freedom 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1983 Freedom 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Freedom 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Freedom 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS