1972 Contest 31 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Contest 312013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerContestBeneteau
Year1972–19822013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsFrance
DesignerDick ZaalVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.5 m² (425 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths52
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 0.65m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1972 Contest 31 displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1972 Contest 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Contest 31 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3