2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
VS
1973 Ranger 33 1973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 1973 Ranger 33
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Ranger
Year 2013 1973–1979
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France USA
Designer VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 10.10 m (33.1 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.40 m (11.2 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 2.10 m (6.9 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,450 kg (7,606 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 65.0 m² (700 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 20 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 40 L (10.6 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 2 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was penned by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 measures 10.10m (33.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 0.04m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The 1973 Ranger 33 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 11.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.90). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 provides 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1973 Ranger 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS