1986 Bavaria 32 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1986 Bavaria 32 1986 Bavaria 32
VS
1973 Ranger 33 1973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1986 Bavaria 32 1973 Ranger 33
General
Manufacturer Bavaria Ranger
Year 1986–1992 1973–1979
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer Dehler Design Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.38 m (27.5 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.70 m (5.6 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,900 kg (4,189 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 46.0 m² (495 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 75 L (19.8 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 130 L (34.3 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Bavaria 32
16.20
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Bavaria 32
38.78
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Bavaria 32
0.77
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Bavaria 32
20.02
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Bavaria 32 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Bavaria 32 is a 1980s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1986 Bavaria 32 was penned by Dehler Design. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1986 Bavaria 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1973 Ranger 33 is 0.31m longer than the 1986 Bavaria 32. The 1986 Bavaria 32 displaces approximately 3% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Bavaria 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1986 Bavaria 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Bavaria 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.8% for the 1986 Bavaria 32 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Bavaria 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 130L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Bavaria 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS