Hunter 27 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

Hunter 27 Hunter 27
VS
1973 Ranger 33 1973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hunter 27 1973 Ranger 33
General
Manufacturer Hunter Ranger
Year 1992–1998 1973–1979
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Hunter Design Team Gary Mull
Dimensions
LOA 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 7.32 m (24.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 2.79 m (9.2 ft) 3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast 907 kg (2,000 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 33.0 m² (355 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 12 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 27
18.23
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 27
36.35
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 27
0.82
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 27
16.96
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 27 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 27 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The Hunter 27 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the Hunter 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.79m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1973 Ranger 33 is 1.83m longer than the Hunter 27. The 1973 Ranger 33 displaces approximately 91% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 27 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 27 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the Hunter 27 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1973 Ranger 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS