1982 S2 7.9 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

1982 S2 7.9 1982 S2 7.9
VS
Hunter 27 Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1982 S2 7.9 Hunter 27
General
Manufacturer S2 Hunter
Year 1982–1988 1992–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Arthur Edmunds Hunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA 7.90 m (25.9 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL 6.71 m (22.0 ft) 7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam 2.84 m (9.3 ft) 2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast 907 kg (2,000 lbs) 907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 31.6 m² (340 ft²) 33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 12 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 1 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 7.9
18.61
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 7.9
39.99
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 7.9
0.87
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 7.9
17.38
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 7.9 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 7.9 is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1982 S2 7.9 was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 7.9 measures 7.90m (25.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The Hunter 27 is 0.33m longer than the 1982 S2 7.9. The Hunter 27 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 7.9 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.61 and 31.6 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1982 S2 7.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 7.9 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 7.9 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 7.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 S2 7.9 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 7.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS