Hunter 27 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

Hunter 27 Hunter 27
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hunter 27 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
Manufacturer Hunter Beneteau
Year 1992–1998 2013
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Hunter Design Team VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL 7.32 m (24.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 2.79 m (9.2 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast 907 kg (2,000 lbs) 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 33.0 m² (355 ft²) 65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 12 HP 20 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 2
Cabins 1 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 27
18.23
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 27
36.35
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 27
0.82
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 27
16.96
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 27 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 27 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The Hunter 27 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the Hunter 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.79m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 1.87m longer than the Hunter 27. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 27 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 27 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the Hunter 27 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 27 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS