1972 Morgan 30 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

1972 Morgan 30
VS
Hunter 27Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Morgan 30Hunter 27
General
ManufacturerMorganHunter
Year1972–19771992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerCharley MorganHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.2 m² (400 ft²)33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Morgan 30
15.37
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Morgan 30
38.82
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Morgan 30
0.76
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Morgan 30
23.12
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Morgan 30 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Morgan 30 is a 1970s design by Morgan from USA, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1972 Morgan 30 was penned by Charley Morgan. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1972 Morgan 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The 1972 Morgan 30 is 0.91m longer than the Hunter 27. The 1972 Morgan 30 displaces approximately 55% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Morgan 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.37 and 37.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Morgan 30 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 38.8% for the 1972 Morgan 30 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Morgan 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Morgan 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1972 Morgan 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Morgan 30 · Hunter 27