1972 Morgan 34 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison

1972 Morgan 34 1972 Morgan 34
VS
1975 Pearson 28 1975 Pearson 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1972 Morgan 34 1975 Pearson 28
General
Manufacturer Morgan Pearson
Year 1972–1978 1975–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Charley Morgan William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL 8.08 m (26.5 ft) 7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam 3.25 m (10.7 ft) 2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Ballast 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) 1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 50.2 m² (540 ft²) 30.0 m² (323 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Morgan 34
15.63
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Morgan 34
41.53
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Morgan 34
0.72
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Morgan 34
24.55
1975 Pearson 28
21.23

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Morgan 34 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Morgan 34 is a 1970s design by Morgan from USA, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1972 Morgan 34 was penned by Charley Morgan. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1972 Morgan 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1972 Morgan 34 is 1.83m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 1972 Morgan 34 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Morgan 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1972 Morgan 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Morgan 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1972 Morgan 34 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Morgan 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Morgan 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1972 Morgan 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1972 Morgan 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS