1986 J/28 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison

1986 J/28 1986 J/28
VS
1975 Pearson 28 1975 Pearson 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1986 J/28 1975 Pearson 28
General
Manufacturer J/Boats Pearson
Year 1986–1990 1975–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Rod Johnstone William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 8.66 m (28.4 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL 7.32 m (24.0 ft) 7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 37.6 m² (405 ft²) 30.0 m² (323 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 12 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 1 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
1975 Pearson 28
21.23

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1986 J/28 is 0.13m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1986 J/28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 J/28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS