1975 Pearson 28 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1975 Pearson 28 1975 Pearson 28
VS
1984 Pearson 34 1984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1975 Pearson 28 1984 Pearson 34
General
Manufacturer Pearson Pearson
Year 1975–1982 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer William Shaw William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 7.01 m (23.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam 2.74 m (9.0 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast 1,270 kg (2,800 lbs) 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 30.0 m² (323 ft²) 46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 20 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Pearson 28
21.23
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Pearson 28 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1975 Pearson 28 was penned by William Shaw. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1984 Pearson 34 is 1.83m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 1984 Pearson 34 displaces approximately 85% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 28 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Pearson 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Pearson 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Pearson 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS