2010 Elan 340 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison
2010 Elan 340
1975 Pearson 28
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2010 Elan 340 | 1975 Pearson 28 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Elan | Pearson |
| Year | 2010–2014 | 1975–1982 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Slovenia | USA |
| Designer | Rob Humphreys | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs) | 1,270 kg (2,800 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) | 30.0 m² (323 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L (21.1 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 160 L (42.3 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2010 Elan 340 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Elan 340 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2010 Elan 340 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the 2010 Elan 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 1.83m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 97% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2010 Elan 340 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2010 Elan 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2010 Elan 340 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2010 Elan 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.