1986 J/28 vs Catalina 250 — Comparison

1986 J/28 1986 J/28
VS
Catalina 250 Catalina 250

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1986 J/28 Catalina 250
General
Manufacturer J/Boats Catalina
Year 1986–1990 1994–2004
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Rod Johnstone Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 8.66 m (28.4 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL 7.32 m (24.0 ft) 6.78 m (22.2 ft)
Beam 3.05 m (10.0 ft) 2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Ballast 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) 612 kg (1,349 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 37.6 m² (405 ft²) 24.5 m² (264 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 12 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 42 L (11.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 4
Cabins 1 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
Catalina 250
18.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
Catalina 250
38.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
Catalina 250
0.89
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
Catalina 250
13.89

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and Catalina 250 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Catalina 250 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Catalina 250 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 250 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 1986 J/28 is 1.04m longer than the Catalina 250. The 1986 J/28 displaces approximately 86% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 250, with an SA/D of 18.30 and 24.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1986 J/28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The Catalina 250 has a comfort ratio of 13.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.89. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 38.5% for the Catalina 250, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Catalina 250 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 42L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 J/28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 J/28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 J/28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS