1972 Morgan 34 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1972 Morgan 34 1972 Morgan 34
VS
Hanse 342 Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1972 Morgan 34 Hanse 342
General
Manufacturer Morgan Hanse
Year 1972–1978 2006–2010
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Charley Morgan judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL 8.08 m (26.5 ft) 9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam 3.25 m (10.7 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 50.2 m² (540 ft²) 52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Morgan 34
15.63
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Morgan 34
41.53
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Morgan 34
0.72
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Morgan 34
24.55
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Morgan 34 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Morgan 34 is a 1970s design by Morgan from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1972 Morgan 34 was penned by Charley Morgan. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1972 Morgan 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1972 Morgan 34 is 0.06m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1972 Morgan 34 displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Morgan 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Morgan 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1972 Morgan 34 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Morgan 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Morgan 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS